Opinion
Supreme Court Rules the Clean Water Act Doesn’t Actually Require That Water Be Clean
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court substantially weakened federal limitations on raw sewage discharge into nearby bodies of water. Its 5–4 decision will, in practice, free cities to dump substantially more sewage into rivers,
Latin Times on MSN1d
Supreme Court Leaves Users Disgusted After Rolling Back Clean Water Act's Raw Sewage Discharge Limitations: 'Poop Is Back On the Menu'The Supreme Court weakened restrictions on the discharge of raw sewage into water supplies in a 5-4 decision to roll back ...
The federal Clean Water Act requires the EPA to set water-pollution standards ... Today’s announcement sets a timeline for the revision process. An October 2018 report from the Environmental ...
The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that sewage plants and other industries cannot avoid environmental requirements under landmark clean-water protections when they send dirty water on an indirect ...
The Supreme Court’s ruling weakens the EPA’s ability to enforce water pollution standards, benefiting corporate interests at the expense of public health and environmental safety. With enforcement ...
It’s a major potential pivot for the half-century-old Clean Water Act, a law prized by environmentalists and grassroots groups and often used to protest pipelines. The statute protects bodies of ...
Supporters of SB 601 say the bill is a response to a 2023 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court and to a second Trump ...
The Clean Water for Iowa Act would address the industry’s pollution by requiring water pollution permits and monitoring at more than 4,000 medium and large factory farms currently operating in ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback