The justices ruled that the agency cannot impose generic prohibitions against violating water quality standards.

Amy Coney Barrett joined the liberal justices in a dissent against Samuel Alito—and his thinly veiled policy agenda.

The U.S. Supreme Court sided with San Francisco on Tuesday in a ruling that narrows the Clean Water Act. The case pitted a ...

The U.S. Supreme Court dealt a blow to the Environmental Protection Agency in a ruling on Tuesday involving a wastewater ...

Tuesday that the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) rules for the city of San Francisco under the Clean Water Act on raw ...

By a 5-4 vote, the court's conservative majority ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency overstepped its authority ...

Supporters of SB 601 say the bill is a response to a 2023 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court and to a second Trump ...

San Francisco argued that Clean Water Act permits should function like recipes that restrict specific ingredients in a dish, ...

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court substantially weakened federal limitations on raw sewage discharge into nearby bodies of water.

The Supreme Court's recent ruling limits EPA's ability to regulate sewage discharge into U.S. waterways affecting water ...

In 5-4 ruling, with Justice Amy Coney Barrett dissent, high court says EPA has responsibility to provide details for ...