PNAS4d
Correction for Hogan et al., The genetic regulatory architecture and epigenomic basis for age-related changes in rattlesnake venom
The authors note “We incorrectly cited NIH grant award P20 GM139767 in the Acknowledgments. The correct acknowledgment should be P20 GM139769.” The online version has been corrected. Note: The article ...
PNAS5d
Correction for Chae et al., Vulnerability to natural disasters and sustainable consumption: Unraveling political and regional differences
The authors note that the author contributions footnote appeared incorrectly. The author contributions footnote should state: “R.L.C. and R.S. designed research; R ...
PNAS5d
A long-distance inhibitory system regulates haustoria numbers in parasitic plants
Edited by Joseph Kieber, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; received November 27, 2024; accepted January 7, 2025 ...
PNAS5d
Reply to Ye: Parallel progress in funder practices and expansion of academic incentives to support engaged research
Today, engaged research is not consistently valued in faculty reward systems that still primarily emphasize scholarly contributions and outputs. In addition, we have heard from funders in TEFN that ...
PNAS5d
Potential limiting factor on engaged research: Academic evaluation systems
I read with interest the paper by Bednarek et al. (1). They identify several factors that may hinder the implementation of engaged research. At the same time, Bednarek et al. give very insightful ...
PNAS6d
GenAI synthetic data create ethical challenges for scientists. Here’s how to address them.
Synthetic GenAI data offer many opportunities to advance scientific research. But they also present ethical challenges that must be addressed in order for researchers to take full advantage of the ...