The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the City and County of San Francisco in a case against the US Environmental Protection Agency involving the ...
An environmental lawyer who wrote an amicus brief in San Francisco v. EPA believes a criticized ruling actually means tougher ...
OLYMPIA, Wash.–An environmental bill that would overhaul several state laws was passed in the Senate on Tuesday, but Senator ...
Americans are getting antsy about the possibility of poop in the drinking water thanks to a new interpretation of the Clean Water Act. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court issued a ruling that many are ...
The Supreme Court’s ruling weakens the EPA’s ability to enforce water pollution standards, benefiting corporate interests at the expense of public health and environmental safety. With enforcement ...
But over the past 50 years, some places have occasionally run afoul of the act. In San Francisco, the wastewater system ...
Continuing the rout of the EPA's authority undertaken by the Trump Administration, the Supreme Court Tuesday overturned rules ...
Veragon develops AWGs that collect water from air humidity, filter it and then process it into mineralized water.
The U.S. Supreme Court limited federal and state regulations under the Clean Water Act, but the practical impact remains to ...
San Francisco argued that Clean Water Act permits should function like recipes that restrict specific ingredients in a dish, ...
The New Jersey-based National Water Main Cleaning Company was sentenced Tuesday in Bridgeport and must also pay $1 million in fines.
The justices ruled that the agency cannot impose generic prohibitions against violating water quality standards.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback