The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the City and County of San Francisco in a case against the US Environmental Protection Agency involving the ...
An environmental lawyer who wrote an amicus brief in San Francisco v. EPA believes a criticized ruling actually means tougher ...
Conservatives on the Supreme Court have again rescued the nation from out-of-control bureaucrats inflicting prohibitive costs ...
Americans are getting antsy about the possibility of poop in the drinking water thanks to a new interpretation of the Clean Water Act. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court issued a ruling that many are ...
The Supreme Court’s ruling weakens the EPA’s ability to enforce water pollution standards, benefiting corporate interests at the expense of public health and environmental safety. With enforcement ...
Continuing the rout of the EPA's authority undertaken by the Trump Administration, the Supreme Court Tuesday overturned rules ...
The U.S. Supreme Court limited federal and state regulations under the Clean Water Act, but the practical impact remains to ...
TAG24 on MSN1d
Supreme Court ruling limiting EPA's ability to regulate water pollution raises alarm bellsThe Supreme Court limited the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to regulate water pollution in a ruling that has ...
The Supreme Court's recent ruling limits EPA's ability to regulate sewage discharge into U.S. waterways affecting water ...
LR22CA, introduced by Senator Dungan. Bill would– the bill would propose an amendment to the Nebraska Constitution, which ...
As the Trump administration slashes the agency’s budget, the court’s conservative majority sided with San Francisco and ...
Other writers look at the attorney general's decision in the Alalkawi case out of Troy, state policy discussions and also ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback